Media Magazines
THEORIES
In very simplistic terms, some texts were fictional and some purported
to be based on fact and the ‘real’ (Macdonald
and Cousins).
"The primary
proposition of cultivation theory states that the more time people spend
'living' in the television world, the more likely they are to believe social
reality portrayed on television. (Gerbner
and Gross)
Vertov argues that
documentary is a way of representing “life as it is” (that is, life filmed
surreptitiously) and ‘life caught unawares’ (life provoked or surprised by the
camera).
Lorentz defines a
documentary as ‘a factual film which is dramatic.
Renov believes there are
four distinct purposes of documentary film (although some documentaries can be
shown to have more than one function):
MM30 PG 10: Reality Bites: Documentary in the 21st Century
O Narrowcasting refers to broadcasting that
targets smaller, more defined audiences. (Offers advertisers a specific,
desired audience.)
O voiceover is a key documentary device and
is used to direct audiences towards a preferred reading.
O focus on Mise-en-Scene, close-ups which
signify what is being told (iconography-Synergy)
The key aspects of the documentary genre
are now being used across various genres but not in an attempt to make a
parody. To make a new branch of documentary that merges the two.
‘How have the core principles of
documentary making evolved in an age of rating wars, channel proliferation and audience
fragmentation? What issues do documentaries raise about the institutions that produce
them and the audiences who consume them?’
People are often arguing that recent
documentaries are‘dumbing down’, suggesting the documentary form has been tabloidised with a stronger emphasis on sensationalism and voyeurism in order to
make them more appealing to mass audiences.
A hybrid documentary has been created in
the form of reality TV, the people are carefully chosen and it slowly becomes
more like a scripted drama.
‘documentary needs opposing characters,
tension and a strong sense of narrative.’
The dramatic exchanges that are typically
seen in the hybrid genre owes as much to Big Brother as it does to traditional
documentary modes of representation.
E.g BBC3 Takeaways
There is constant binary opposition created:
- Between the workers
- The workers and those in charge
- The lives of the workers and the lives of
the Brits.
The has always used to create a narrative however more recently it has
been used to much and has become the focus of some products rather that the
facts being investigated or explored.
Factsheet 62: Realism in Television
Realism: The attempt to show subjects and
events as they are in everyday life.
Anne Fischel believes that ‘all documentary is biased’ the sheer fact
that footage is being constructed and edited to suit a narrative and regulations
means that bias has been created regardless of whether it was intentional. Even
the removal of the smallest but of information can change a narrative and the
way the audience perceives.
Types of realism:
Link to Making a Murderer shots?
‘Home Videos’
Prison
Factsheet 52: Documenting ‘The Real’
‘Even in its infancy, when documentaries
were composed of a single shot and lasted less than a minute, cinema was
divided into two camps: those who looked to the ‘real world’ for their subject
matter, and those who filmed performance’
Even in the beginning people used the
documentary genre as a platform for drama rather than facts.
One of the first documentary makers were
the Lumiere Brothers- who also invented the 50 ft stock film, enabling longer
filming periods – they concentrated on brief moments of everyday life. They did
it because they believed that the audience of the time(1895) were ‘more engaged
in how ‘real life’ was being represented’ they also seemed to be more affected
by these representations.
(Diverting Time: London’s Cinemas and their
Audiences, 1906-1914')
In the early days of cinema, documentary provided
information for audiences.
‘as fictional texts became more sophisticated they became more popular
and began to dominate over factual ones. Audiences seemed to prefer to see
fictional representations rather than factual ones, although news and
information was still shown through newsreels.’
The rise of television has meant that
documentary became more suited for a ‘living room’ experience rather than a
cinematic one, in saying that there have been many successful cinematic
releases such as:
Fahrenheit 9/11(Moore, 2004),
Super Size Me (Spurlock, 2004),
March of the Penguins (Jaquet, 2005),
An Inconvenient Truth (Guggenheim, 2006)
‘They are constructed and mediated and are designed to create
specific meaning and effect and have different functions. ‘
TYPES OF DOCUMENTARY
Expository- these documentaries often have a
conventional narrative structure and present ideas through cause and effect.
Codes and Conventions - authoritative
commentary employing voiceover or title. They try to persuade the viewer, commentary
often sounds ‘objective’ and omniscient (all seeing and knowing).
Observational- They attempt to spontaneously
observe lived life with a minimum of intervention.
Codes and
Conventions - mobile lightweight cameras and portable sound recording equipment,
offer a sense of immediacy and intimacy.
Participatory- Where the
film-maker is part of the narrative of the documentary.
Codes and
Conventions - Filmmaker is part of the film, we also get a sense of how
situations in the film are affected or altered by their presence. Interviews
Reflexive – These documentaries seek to draw attention to their own
construction and the fact that they are representations.
Codes and Conventions - Question the way the world is represented
in documentaries, Highly sceptical of ‘realism’
Performative - These documentaries are personal, subjective and often focus on
emotional responses.
Codes and Conventions - hypothetical enactments, end themselves to
providing a way for minority groups to ‘speak about themselves.’
If performative is a choice, then it lends itself to the creation
of docu-drama’s. Creators may underestimate the impact of the performance
elements.
CRITICAL INVESTIGATION
In order to appeal to an
audience and enable them to develop their own opinions completely, there would
have to be some kind of interest, whether it be entertainment or education. But, to be an easy narrative to
follow and suit a timescale, information has to be left out. The information
removed can inadvertently create bias. Sometimes institutions intentionally do
this, they want to make a group of people seem a certain way. Sometimes it is
so subtle that it is actually difficult to apply theories such as the (Gerber’s
– cultivation theory?) hypodermic needle
as the evidence is either well-hidden or miniscule. So how do we
know when there is an intentional desire to discriminate or be prejudiced?
Where is the line of privacy when it comes to Criminal Justice cases?
The Thin Blue
Line(1988) is a documentary film made by Errol Morris. It
follows the story of Randall Dale Adams who was convicted and sentenced to
death for murdering Texas Police Officer: Robert W. Wood. The film ‘is cited as being
instrumental in his exoneration the following year.’ This is similar to Making a Murderer and the pressure/influence the active
audience had in ensuring that Dassey’s case was taken as seriously as it should
have been. Despite the changes occurring with the Halbach case, it was
not the same with the Woods case. In 1989, Adams was released but it was
decided that there was to be no prosecution against the real murderer due to
the length of time since the crime. Perhaps this was due to the lack of new/digital media, it wouldn’t have
been easy to share your opinion and try to make a stand, the investigation into
the original case may not have ever happened had it not been for social media.
If this film/case had occurred 20+ years later there would be reason to believe
that a retrial or even official investigation would have taken place. This may
only be a result of the film trending online, trends can be incredibly
unpredictable so there may not have been enough attention brought to this
issue. Yet, this doesn’t mean that future cases that may arise and/or be made
into a media production, would see a positive and just result. The
internet is unpredictable and the views/intention of online users don’t always
translate smoothly into reality. Another real-life example that has certain
reflections of Dassey’s trial/retrials is Derek Bentley’s case, in 1953 he was hanged for the murder of a
policeman, a crime which was later quashed in 1998 and had a 45 yearlong
campaign that created widespread controversy. In 1990 M J Trow had written a
book Let Him Have It, Chris which explored the inconsistencies in the police
version of events. Even
though this is a more traditional medium, given the time of the events and
publishing, it could be suggested that this had a similar effect to Making a
Murderer. Events had been explored and it was left to the audience to develop
their own opinion, ultimately resulting in the favour of the protagonist’s
innocence.
NDM STORIES
Is big-budget television threatening
cinema?
http://katie13exam.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/220317-is-big-budget-television.html